|
For immediate release, Jan. 20, 2010
Contact: Cannabis Therapy Institute
1-877-420-4205
First Medical Marijuana Law Enforcement Bill
Introduced
ACTION ALERT
Print this PDF document and make copies.
If you own a medical cannabis business, post it near a phone and
make sure all your customers call.
http://www.cannabistherapyinstitute.com/bills/vote.no.sb109.pdf
Background
The first of the Law Enforcement bills designed to restrict patients'
access to medical marijuana in Colorado was officially introduced
into the state Senate today by Sen. Chris Romer (D-Denver) and Senator
Nancy Spence (R-Centennial). The bill is Senate Bill 109 and has
been introduced into the Senate Health and Human Services Committee.
A hearing has not been scheduled.
Click
here to read the entire bill
Required Exams for Patients
Senate Bill 109 redefines the term "bona-fide physician-patient
relationship" from Article
XVIII, Section 14 of the Colorado Constitution (Colorado's Medical
Marijuana Law).
The new definition requires the patient to receive a full physical
exam by a physician in order to obtain a Medical Marijuana Registry
Card. In addition, "follow-up care and treatment" by that
same physician would be required every year.
This will dramatically increase the cost of of a Medical Marijuana
Registry card to the medical marijuana patient. A full physical
exam costs anywhere from $250 to $500. Follow-up office visits cost
from $200 to $500.
Cost of Medical Marijuana Registry Card
Current Yearly Cost to Patients
Examination of previous medical history by a physician: $100
Registration fee for the State: $90
Total: $190
New SB109 Cost to Patients
Full physical exam: $250 to $500
One followup visit: $200 to $500
Registration fee for the State: $90
New total: $540 to $1090
SB-109 fails to specify how many times per year a patient must
see his or her physician for "follow-up care and treatment",
but it could be required more than once a year, driving the cost
up even further.
"This will be a crushing blow to patients," says Timothy
Tipton of Rocky Mountain Caregivers Cooperative. "Patients
were already having a difficult time coming up with an $200 a year
for their Registry card. Thousands of patients will be denied access
to medical marijuana because they cannot afford these new fees."
Additional Exam Requirements
SB-109 fails to recognize that many patients' primary care physicians
will not sign a recommendation for medical marijuana because of
fear of reprisal. CTI has been told by several patients that physicians
working for Kaiser Permanente HMO are not allowed to recommend medical
marijuana. Other physicians have also stated they will not sign
medical marijuana recommendations out of fears of reprisal from
the State of Colorado or the DEA. This means that thousands of patients
across Colorado will have to obtain physical exams from physicians
other than their primary care physician.
SB-109 would also mean that physical exams and medical histories
that are performed by these patients' primary care physicians will
not be enough evidence of a patient's current medical condition
to satisfy the State of Colorado. Currently, qualified physicians
can review a patient's medical history and recommend marijuana based
on previous assessments by the patient's primary care physician
and other experts. Physicians who specialize in medical marijuana
shouldn't be required to perform a new physical exam each year and
perform followup care on patients, many of whom may already have
had these exams performed by their primary care physician.
Record-Keeping Requirements
SB109 also requires physicians to maintain separate records for
all medical marijuana patients and requires them to surrender these
records to the State Board of Medical Examiners upon request. This
additional burden on physicians will drive the cost to patients
up even further.
Medical Marijuana Review Board ("Pain Panel")
SB109 also sets up a "Medical Marijuana Review Board"
of 7 people appointed by the Governor who will review Medical Marijuana
Registry applications for all patients under 21 years of age. Only
"veterans of military service", but not current members
of the military, would be exempt.
The Cannabis Therapy Institute opposes the creation of a medical
review board that would be allowed to override the recommendation
of a physician that a patient might benefit from the medical use
of cannabis. The physician/patient relationship is sacrosanct, and
the state has no right or authority to deny a patient's Constitutional
right to use cannabis as medicine if their physician recommends
it, regardless of the patient's age. The state should not come between
a patient and his physician with the equivalent of a "Pain
Panel" that gets to determine whether or not a qualified patient
is in "true" pain.
This "Pain Panel" is an unnecessary and discriminatory
burden on younger patients, who would be forced to suffer through
a humiliating and embarrassing hearing concerning their medical
condition. Why not have a Vicodin Review Board for 18-20 year olds?
We need to trust physicians in their recommendations.
Attorney Rob Corry, in a previous analysis of this idea, stated:
"The specter of these vulnerable young patients facing a Governor-appointed
board of overseers for 'permission' to access his or her constitutionally-protected,
physician-recommended medicine does not belong in a free country.
This Boards very existence is unconstitutional."
http://www.cannabistherapyinstitute.com/bills/romer.draft.corry.comments1.pdf
How to Contact the Senate HHS Committee
We need to contact the Senate HHS Committee and ask them to vote
NO on SB109.
1) Be respectful and calm.
2) In your own words, state your reasons that you would like them
to vote against SB109. Here are some talking points:
SB109 is bad for patients because it:
- Raises the costs to patients by requiring extra exams and recordkeeping
- Raises the costs to patients by not allowing their previous medical
history to be used to determine whether they would benefit from
medical marijuana
- Allows a Medical Review Board to override the decision of a qualified
physician that someone under 21 might benefit from the use of medical
marijuana.
- Is discriminatory, because no other medicine in the state is regulated
so harshly
3) The bill is a solution in search of a problem. The Colorado
State Board of Medical Examiners already has a system set up to
deal with complaints about fraudulent physicians. These additional
burdens are unnecessary and discriminatory.
http://www.dora.state.co.us/medical/complaints.htm
4) Ask the Senator if they would be willing to sponsor a Medical
Marijuana Patient Bill of Rights, that takes into consideration
the concerns of patients. The current bills are all geared towards
law enforcement and restricting the Constitutional rights of patients
to use medical cannabis. We need a champion in the Senate that will
help protect patients, not try to restrict their rights to medicine.
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
7 Members:
Senator Betty Boyd (D), Chairwoman
District 21: (Jefferson County)
Phone: (303) 866-4857
E-mail: betty.boyd.senate@state.co.us
Senator Linda Newell (D), Vice-Chairman
Distirct 26 (Arapahoe and Jefferson counties)
Phone:: 303-866-4846
E-mail: linda.newell.senate@gmail.com
Senator Morgan Carroll (D)
District 29 (Arapahoe County)
Profession: Attorney/Small Business Owner
Phone: : 303-866-4879
E-mail: morgan.carroll.senate@state.co.us
Senator Kevin Lundberg (R)
Phone: 303-866-4853
E-mail: kevin@kevinlundberg.com
Senator Shawn Mitchell (D)
District 23 (Adams, Broomfield and Weld counties)
Profession: Attorney
Phone: 303-866-4876
E-mail: shawnmitch@aol.com
Senator Paula E. Sandoval (D)
Profession: Businesswoman
Phone:: 303-866-4862
E-mail: nwden34@yahoo.com
Senator David C. Schultheis (R)
District 9 (El Paso)
Profession: Real Estate Investor (Retired)
Phone: 303-866-4835
E-mail: senatorschultheis@gmail.com
|